How Intelligent People Deal with Difficult People: Schopenhauer’s Philosophy
Albert BarraOctober 21, 2026 · 5 min read
THE IDEA
Arthur Schopenhauer’s philosophy offers valuable lessons for managing difficult people, avoiding unproductive arguments and developing stronger emotional intelligence. A reflection on leadership, judgement, self-control and intellectual humility in professional relationships and hospitality.
LEAD HOSPITALITY·INSIGHTS
HOTEL MANAGEMENT
Intelligence does not lie in winning every argument, but in knowing which ones are not worth pursuing.
Over the years, I have learned that one of the greatest sources of professional strain does not necessarily come from difficult decisions, but from certain human relationships. People who always need to be right, who mistake disagreement for an offence, or who turn every conversation into a contest of egos. And, interestingly, the more we try to reason with them, the harder it seems to reach an understanding.
In Hospitality, where we interact daily with guests, colleagues, suppliers and people with different interests, knowing how to manage these situations is essential. We cannot choose every interaction, but we can decide how much space we give each one and how we respond to unconstructive behaviour.
For a long time, I believed that any disagreement could be resolved through reason, patience and a sufficiently persuasive explanation. Experience has shown me that this is not always the case. Some people argue to understand, while others simply seek to impose their views. Recognising the difference saves us time, frustration and impulsive decisions.
The German philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer (1788–1860) devoted part of his thinking to exploring the contradictions of human nature, particularly our tendency to defend our pride even when reason contradicts us. In The Art of Being Right, published posthumously, he described the strategies we use to prevail in an argument, regardless of the truth of our reasoning.
His reflections remain strikingly relevant today. Especially for those of us who work with people and must make decisions under pressure. Because true professional maturity begins when we stop confusing being right with needing others to acknowledge it.
Schopenhauer’s lessons for dealing with difficult people
Schopenhauer observed that many arguments are not intended to uncover the truth, but to protect the vanity of those involved. And when pride replaces reason, even the strongest arguments can prove useless.
This idea has led me to adopt several principles that I consider especially valuable in hotel leadership and team management:
Do not argue with someone who does not want to listen. A conversation requires two people willing to understand one another. If someone systematically rejects every argument, insisting rarely improves the outcome. Sometimes, stepping away shows better judgement than carrying on.
Do not confuse intelligence with education. I have met people with little formal education and an extraordinary capacity for reflection, as well as highly qualified professionals unable to admit a mistake. True intelligence also requires intellectual humility.
Do not respond to provocation emotionally. When someone tries to discredit us or provoke a reaction, losing our composure means allowing them to dictate our behaviour. Calm is not weakness; it is self-control.
Learn to use silence. Not every statement requires a response. Remaining silent in the face of provocation can be a deliberate choice, provided it does not mean tolerating injustice, abuse or situations requiring our intervention.
Do not try to convince everyone. Some people will change their minds when they encounter better arguments. Others will interpret any disagreement as a personal threat. Our responsibility is to reason and explain, not to achieve unanimity.
Set boundaries politely. Being respectful does not mean accepting disrespect. We can maintain a firm position without resorting to arrogance, disparagement or aggression.
Question your own certainties, too. This may be the most important lesson. We can all behave foolishly when our pride is involved. Intelligence begins by recognising that we, too, can be wrong.
Recommended reading429 pages · PDF
Directing Hotels
What Nobody Tells You Before You Sit in the General Manager’s Chair
A practical look at leadership, teams, operations and the real decisions that define hotel management from the General Manager’s chair.
True intelligence is demonstrated in the way we act
In Hospitality, these reflections have very practical consequences. A poorly managed conflict can damage the working environment, undermine the guest experience or consume hours that should be devoted to improving the business.
I have learned that leading does not mean responding to every criticism or winning every argument. It means listening carefully, distinguishing legitimate differences of opinion from provocation, and making decisions without allowing ego to dictate our behaviour.
We must also avoid a dangerous interpretation of Schopenhauer: considering anyone who does not share our views to be foolish. A colleague who questions a decision may be pointing out an error we have not yet identified. Critical thinking is an opportunity to learn, not a threat to our authority.
That is why I find it useful to distinguish between those who disagree with reasoned arguments and those who seek to discredit others without listening. We should pay attention to the former, even when their observations are uncomfortable. With the latter, it is wise to remain composed, set boundaries and avoid circular arguments.
In professional relationships, maturity also means understanding that we do not need to constantly prove our worth. Our credibility is built through consistent decisions, respect for others and the ability to acknowledge our own mistakes.
My first piece of advice is that, before entering into an argument, you should ask yourself what you can realistically achieve through it. If there is a reasonable chance of solving a problem, improving a decision or learning something, it is worth investing the time. If it merely fuels a personal confrontation, it may be better to take a different approach.
The second is not to let another person’s behaviour determine your own. We may encounter arrogance, injustice or provocation, but we remain responsible for our responses. Composure is one of the quietest and most powerful forms of authority.
And the third, probably the most difficult, is never to stop examining your own convictions. Over the years, I have discovered that some of my best decisions began when someone dared to tell me I was wrong. Perhaps the best way to deal with foolishness is precisely this: to learn to recognise it without forgetting that none of us is entirely immune to it.
KEEP EXPLORING
This article ends here. The archive does not.
Lead Hospitality brings together 1200 English articles published since 2018: years of experiences, decisions and lessons you can keep exploring.
CONTINUE FROM HERE
What would you like to explore next?
Choose a direction and keep reading around what you want to solve, learn or challenge.
For too long, hospitality has confused guest-centric service with submission to the guest. Guests deserve respect, to be heard and an excellent experience—but that does not mean accepting…
We use necessary cookies to make the site work and, only with your permission, optional cookies for analytics, personalisation and marketing. You can change your choice at any time.