4 min read•Albert Barra
The Guest–Hotel Brand Marriage (Part 4): Spurious Loyalty and No Loyalty

Albert BarraSeptember 24, 2018 · 4 min read
This article examines spurious loyalty, where low relative attitude is paired with high purchase behaviour, and no loyalty, characterised by low attitude and low repeat purchase behaviour.

LEAD HOSPITALITY·INSIGHTS
HOTEL CRM

In the third instalment, I explained loyalty based on a relatively high attitudinal commitment and variations in purchasing behaviour. In this article, I will address it from the perspective of low relative attitude and different purchasing behaviour.
False loyalty.
(Low Attitude – High Behaviour)
Also referred to as artificial loyalty, pseudo-loyalty or inertia. This type of loyalty involves an unfavourable attitude towards the hotel brand, coupled with high repeat purchasing.
This type of loyalty is associated with low-priced brands that are easy and frequently purchased.
Customers within this category are, or feel, trapped by the brand, and switching to another one is very costly for them; they are therefore also known as “hostage” or “vulnerable” customers.
Brand loyalty is adopted through inertia as a result of low involvement, evidenced by the absence of active research and evaluation, either because research costs are high or simply because it is considered unnecessary.
This category is driven by the influence of various situational factors, such as:
False loyalty.
(Low Attitude – High Behaviour)
Also referred to as artificial loyalty, pseudo-loyalty or inertia. This type of loyalty involves an unfavourable attitude towards the hotel brand, coupled with high repeat purchasing.
This type of loyalty is associated with low-priced brands that are easy and frequently purchased.
Customers within this category are, or feel, trapped by the brand, and switching to another one is very costly for them; they are therefore also known as “hostage” or “vulnerable” customers.
Brand loyalty is adopted through inertia as a result of low involvement, evidenced by the absence of active research and evaluation, either because research costs are high or simply because it is considered unnecessary.
This category is driven by the influence of various situational factors, such as:
- the absence of alternatives.
- the absence of qualitative differences between brands, or the inability to distinguish them, etc.
- “Inertia” purchases driven by habits or customs, and even chance.
- Repeat purchases resulting from promotions and special discount offers, or from high switching costs due to economic, psychological or technical factors.
FREE READING LIMIT REACHED
Keep reading without waiting for the next reset
Your free access includes 6 reads per week. Subscribe to continue now.
Already have access?Sign in
